Jordan Peterson, the Jungian psychologist, vaguely Gorean guru of the "masculine spirit" and crusader against political correctness, has threatened to sue author Kate Manne and Vox.com over an interview where she described portions of his book as sexist.
Manne is an author and Cornell University assistant professor. Howard Levitt, Peterson's lawyer, demanded that the interview, posted as "A feminist philosopher makes the case against Jordan Peterson", be removed from the internet.
Irin Carmon reports:
Among the statements Levitt objected to: Manne's contention that Peterson's book included "some really eyebrow-raising, authoritarian-sounding, and even cruel things," as well as her observation that "it doesn't seem accidental that [Peterson's] skepticism about objective facts arises when it's conveniently anti-feminist." The lawyer and his client were equally unhappy with this line: "I also suspect that for many of Peterson's readers, the sexism on display above is one tool among many to make forceful, domineering moves that are typical of misogyny."
I haven't read the book Manne discussed, but among the other things Peterson is famous for is suggesting that women who wear makeup to work are hypocrites if they then complain about sexual harassment. He works, in this respect, as a gooey strand of connective tissue between the superficies of academia and the little feminine things that enrage weak men everday.
Vox has no plans to remove its interview with Manne.
Read the restVox's Sean Illing wrote that he interviewed Manne precisely because she, "unlike many Peterson critics, actively engaged with his ideas." Says Illing of Peterson's saber-rattling, "I found the request absurd and forwarded it to our legal advisers, who confirmed that it was baseless, and then I happily ignored it.
